Posts Tagged ‘blogging’


Online Writing

June 24, 2008

Reading a short Slate piece this morning directed me to this essay on online writing/reading by Caleb Crain. Much of this essay addresses my own concerns and mirrors some of my own reflections on the topic (and I too have a personal blog that is rarely read, but serves as the inspiration for much of these reflections).

The observation here is particularly astute (or at least accurate to my own situation):

This willingness in readers to overlook form raises a question as to whether online writing entertains, in the traditional sense of the word. I am not sure that it does. Reading online does not seem to me to be a pleasure in itself but a response to irritation. That is, it is not like eating an ice cream cone; it is like scratching an itch. I am only reporting on my own feelings here, of course, but while I am doing so, let me report a further kink in them. Between us, my boyfriend and I subscribe to more than a dozen magazines, and if I pick one up, I know instantly that I am goofing off. Online reading, however, fails to set off my leisure detection system. Part of the failure may be perceptual—online reading takes place while I’m sitting in front of my laptop, immobilized, as I am when working. But I think, too, that online writing may, even in its supposedly silly moments, be covertly work-like: there is a fair amount of tedium in its unedited prose. Many of the jokes and references are only comprehensible to regular visitors. No one, my hit counter tells me, reads blogs on the weekend. And reading online prose is not refreshing. An action movie leaves the viewer juiced; a novel may leave the reader wistful. But reading blogs, in my experience, leaves me more addled and nervous than when I began. This work-like character makes the internet particularly corrosive , by the way, to the productivity of those who work at home, such as writers. Through web browsing, the freelancer communes with the procrastinating office drone—at his peril, because the freelancer receives no weekly paycheck.

This workiness is exaggerated in those who, like me, maintain personal blogs and work blogs. It confuses the line between work-related reading/writing and funtime-related reading/writing. Work becomes more enjoyable but leisure becomes more work-like blending together into seamless tedium. This is probably a situation not too far different than lifetime readers who pursue graduate literature degrees, but perhaps more detrimental in the way Crain describes above, the PhD student, afterall, can use leisurely reading in future research.


What Killed the Mediasaur?

June 2, 2008

I doubt many people cried over the loss of the telegram, and certainly no one laments its loss today. And while there has been a constant cry from the distances for radio theatre, it is a clear minority that would choose the radio show over TV or movies.

But Michael Crichton ruffled a lot of feather back in 1993 when he predicted the demise of the mass media in an article for Wired he called “Mediasaurus.” Slate magazine has returned to the article, and its author, in what could be the last moment before his 15 year-old prediction becomes fact.

Of course, unlike with telegrams and radio theatre, the potential negative impact with mass media extinction…er….media mass extinction will be much larger. The big concern is that with the death of mass media, information-seekers will be left to the stormy and unnavigable internet–populated, as it is, with unreliable and uneducated “bloggers.”

But we should remember that our early newspapers were no less biased and ill-formed that many blogs are today and, unlike the early newspaper age, there are already a great many very well-informed, trained journalists and academics participating in the blogoshpere, as well as a very lively online journalism environment.

It remains to be seen how either of those two realities will persist in the absence of 1) the mass media sourcing apparatus that informs most blogs or 2) money, but “the market,” like “nature,” tends to find a way.

This entry was posted by: Jim